Faubourg Saint Denis

Au téléphone:
Thomas: Oui?
Francine: Thomas, listen!
T: Francine…
F: listen:
“There are times, when life calls out for a change, a transition. Like the seasons. Our spring was wonderful; but summer’s over now. And we missed out on autumn. And now, all of a sudden. Its cold. So cold everything’s freezing over. Our love fell asleep; and the snow, took it by surprise. But if you fall asleep in the snow, you don’t feel death coming. Take care.”
Fin de la conversation.
Flash back:
F: “Let me out. Please!”
Francine je me souviens exactement…
F: “Bruno?”
…s’était le 15mai…
F: “Bruno you bastard!”
…le printemps tardé, la pluie menacée, et tu criées…
F: “Bruno, i’m dying here! Please Bruno! Bruno Please! I can’t take it anymore!”
T: Hello!
F: “Why can’t anybody hear me!”
T: I hear you! Who is Bruno?
F: I’m rehearsing, can’t you see?
T: Umm no, sorry.
F: No, no, i’m sorry.
T: You are an actress?
F: Trying to be… I’ve and audition today
T: At the conservatoire?
F: Yeah.
T: What kind of scene was that?
F: It’s… it’s from this pretty bad movie i was in once. It’s my only one so far but… i’m this prostitute who gets beat and raped by her pimp and then he locks her in this dark cell all day long and she goes nuts, but at the end they still get married.
T: a pimp and a prostitute?
F: (Sounds a bell) Shit! it’s ten?
T: So?
F: I have to be there at ten.
T: I know a shortcut, come on!
F: Wait! Wait!
T: This way.
F: Are you sure?
T: Straight!
F: That was fast. Thanks!
T: Bonne chance.
T: Et tu as été admise bien sur.
Tu as quitté Boston pour emménager à Paris, un petit appartement dans la rue du faubourg Saint Denis.
Je t’ai montré notre cartier, mes bars, mon école. Je t’ai présenté à mes amis, à mes parents.
J’ai écouté les textes que tu répétais, tes chants, tes espoirs, tes désirs, ta musique.
Tu as écouté la mienne, mon Italien, mon Allemand, mes brides de Russe.
Je t’ai donné un walkman. Tu m’as offert un oreiller et un jour… tu m’as embrassé.
Le temps passé, le temps filé, et tout paraissait si facile, si simple, libre, si nouveau et si unique.
On allait au cinéma, on allait danser, faire des courses, on riait, tu pleurais, on nageait, on fumait, on se rasait.
De temps à autres tu criais, sans aucune raison, ou avec raison parfois… Oui avec raison parfois.
Je t’accompagnais au conservatoire, je révisais mes examens, j’écoutais tes exercices de chant, tes espoirs, tes désirs, ta musique.
Tu écoutais la mienne, nous étions proches, si proches, toujours plus proche.
Nous allions au cinéma, nous allions nager, rions ensemble, tu criais avec une raison parfois et parfois sans. Le temps passait, le temps filait.
Je t’accompagnais au conservatoire, je révisais mes examens, tu m’écoutais parler Italien, Allemand, Russe, Français, je révisais mes examens, tu criais… parfois avec raison. Le temps passait, sans raisons. Tu criais sans raisons, je révisais mes examens, mes examens, mes examens, mes examens, le temps passait, tu criais, tu criais, tu criais.
J’allais au cinéma.
F: “Bruno do you hear me? I’m dying! Open up! Can anybody hear me?” (Movie’s dialogue)
T: Pardonne moi Francine.
Au téléphone:
T: Oui?
F: Hey what happened? You’re gone all of a sudden. You hung up? Was it that bad? Thomas, are you still mad about yesterday?
T: Non…
F: Tell me, was it believable?… I see, shit! It doesn’t work like that huh?
How are you supposed to say: “our spring was wonderful; but summer’s over” without sounding completely melodramatic? Ughh Whatever! The director loved it, so i have to find a way.
Thomas, are you listening to me?
T: No, I see you.

4th Quarter Projects

You need to complete 2 of these 3 projects for your 4th quarter Understanding Film grade.

  1. The Western (see post below)
  2. Genre Study: Pick Your Own (see post below)
  3. Make a short film, either…
  • a trailer for a non-existent feature film (1-2 minutes)
  • a public service announcement (for a real cause) (60 seconds)

If you have a different idea for a film project, consult with me before you go for it. I’ll probably say yes.

We’ll set some dates for this.

Here’s a fake trailer from a former student:

And here’s a PSA NOT from a former student:

Genre Study: Pick Your Own

Make a keynote presentation (or write a 4-6 page paper), which explores commonalities of form and content in 3 or more films in a film genre of your choosing. At least one of the films should be a classic of its genre, and at least one should be a modern or postmodern remaking of that genre.

In order to understand the workings of a particular genre, you will need to do some background research:

  • read about all the genres in your text book and then choose one of the genres to study. Use the text book as a guide to choosing films for your project.
  • You can also consult filmsite.org for more suggestions of genres and subgenres. It’s a good site for suggesting both genres and movies that fit those genres.
  • if your chosen genre is Western, Film Noir, The Combat Film, or Romantic comedy, then watch the 55-minute documentary on that genre from 100 Years of American Cinema. I can loan you a copy.
  • read reviews of the films you plan to watch by searching “external reviews” for those films on the Internet Movie Database (imdb) or at metacritic.com
  • find out about that genre through independent research on the web. Start with two website which are often good sources for film: Wikipedia.org and filmsite.org. They both have articles on each film genre. And explore from there.
  • read one or more articles chosen or approved by me to supplement your genre study.

Your presentation or paper should:

1. Define the genre, and discuss what is typical of it.

2.  discuss (with clips) your three films as examples of the genre.

3. Make connections with your readings by using at least 3 different quotations.

The Western

High Noon & Unforgiven: 2 versions of the Western

Compare and contrast the “classic” Western High Noon with the “revisionist” Western Unforgiven, in terms of:

  • the gunfighter heroes (Will Kane vs. William Munny)
  • the women
  • the depiction of communities in the Wild West

The purpose of the paper is not to say why you liked or didn’t like each film, but rather to show similarities and differences between them.

*

Your paper should also draw on background sources (listed below) to inform your thinking. You need to show that you’ve read and made use of these sources by including at least 4 direct quotations in your paper. Quote them, identify the source of the quote, and then use each quote as a jumping point for you to explore in High Noon and Unforgiven the issues the quotations raise.

*

I consider High Noon to be a classic, or what Bernard Dick calls a mythic Western. That is, it follows and accepts many of the characters and themes that are typical of the Western genre (as discussed, for example, in the documentary we saw about Westerns and in Dick.) Bernard Dick calls Unforgiven an antimythic Western. That is, it challenges those classic themes, and asks the audience to question them. Bernard’s discussion of Unforgiven will be particularly useful.

Your paper should be typed, double-spaced, and 3-5  pages long.

Readings and Resources:

The Western (documentary film from 100 Years of American Cinema)

Anatomy of Film: pages 124-132 (section on the Western genre)
A video by A.O. Scott, New York Times film critic, American Character and the Western

Quotes from various sources that I cobbled together into a pdf, including readings from Warshow, filmsite.org, Berardinelli, Ebert, Rolling Stone, and Saunders)

A piece especially about the relationship between Will and Helen Ramirez, from a Mexican point of view, the one that translates the Spanish dialogue.

Deborah Allison, “Do Not Forsake Me: The Ballad of High Noon” and the Rise of the Movie Theme Song”, a genuine piece of Film Studies Scholarship from Senses of Cinema journal about the theme song of High Noon.

An article by Manfred Weinhorn “High Noon: Liberal Classic? Conservative Screed” that puts the film in the context of politics of the 1950’s and since.

An extensive article from filmsite.org about the western genre.

Reviews of High Noon: James Bernardinelli and Bosley Crowther‘s original New York Times review in 1952.

Reviews of Unforgiven: Roger Ebert, James Bernardinelli,  and Rolling Stone.

A.O. Scott’s New York Times Article on the western genre, “How the Western Was Won

Script of Unforgiven is here.

Ya Gotta See This!

Make a video essay in the style of A. O. Scott’s Critics Picks or Jeff Fischer’s “Captain Renault: Decidedly Bi” based on a film of your choice.

Due March 24 & 25 Red and Blue

Here’s a quick how-to:

  1. Pick a movie that you have something to say about. The “something” should be thesis-like, examining a theme in the film, or looking closely as a character, or analyzing style. That is, more than just pointing out stuff you like.
  2. Watch it carefully and choose “quotes”  – that is, clips that illustrate what you have to say.
  3. Handbrake the whole movie or else the individual chapters in which these clips are located into “normal” mp4 files. I’ll show you how to use this and the other needed programs if you don’t know yet. (And don’t forget to throw this all out after you’ve extracted the clips you need.)
  4. Using MPeg Streamclip, extract the clips from the chapters, making sure you give each clip a unique name.
  5. Write your script and practice so you won’t look as lame as I did reading (so lame that I re-edited the movie to get rid of my own image).
  6. Record your script onto video with the Mac’s built-in camera. You can just do it in iMovie, or in Garage band, or  use  a video camcorder and then import the footage.
  7. Import each of these pieces into iMovie and edit it into a 3-8 minute videopodcast.
  8. I suggest the less of your face the better (that was my mistake), since most people would rather see a film clip than a talking head. Plan your clips so that parts can have the sound lowered to hear your voiceovers.

Here’s my video about Captain Renault of Casablanca:

A.O. Scott of the New York Times does this professionally. You can find his podcast, Critics’ Picks with A.O. Scott, free at the iTunes store.

Take a look at some other Mt. Ararat student work from previous years (but — spoiler alert — we may be watching some of these movies later on in class)

Erin Fitzsimmons’s “A Pawn No More” — an analysis of the character of Terry Malloy in On the Waterfront:

Erin Weathers’s “The Holly Golightly Style” — about the appeal of the Audrey Hepburn character in Breakfast at Tiffany’s.

And Matt Graeff’s analysis of the “creatures” in the film Pan’s Labyrinth: